M&J Group Files
Bid-rigging: Open
ANALYSIS

Why Competition in School Roofing Contracts Matters

Public funds, roof safety and taxpayer value — why procurement integrity in school roofing is a public-interest issue.

Last verified: 5 October 2026

IMPORTANT DISTINCTION

The penalties described on this website concern failures to comply with CMA investigative requirements during an inspection.

The separate CMA investigation into suspected bid-rigging remains ongoing.

The CMA has expressly stated that no assumption should currently be made that competition law has been infringed.

Aerial view of a school roof, desaturated

School roofing contracts are funded by public money — whether through local-authority budgets, Department for Education Condition Improvement Fund allocations, or other capital programmes. Competition among contractors for these contracts matters because it directly affects the price and quality of work delivered to schools.

Why It Matters

  • School repair budgets — public funds allocated to keep buildings safe and functional.
  • Public funds — taxpayer money spent on school infrastructure.
  • Roof safety — sound roofing protects pupils, staff and buildings.
  • Fair procurement — open competition delivers better value.
  • Taxpayer value — competitive tenders reduce the cost to the public purse.
  • Competition among SMEs — many roofing firms are SMEs that depend on fair access to public contracts.

This page uses architecture, school roofs and public procurement graphics — not images of children — to avoid emotional manipulation.

Source

CMA / GOV.UK — investigation scope including school roofing [S001]

M&J Group Files

Independent Investigative Publication

An independent investigation into M&J Group, CMA enforcement, public procurement and the roofing bid-rigging inquiry. Not affiliated with M & J Group (Construction & Roofing) Ltd.

M&J Group Files is an independent investigative publication and is not affiliated with M & J Group (Construction & Roofing) Ltd. The publication reports regulatory decisions, public procurement records, Companies House filings, official documents and attributable reporting. The CMA's administrative penalties relating to investigatory compliance are distinct from the separate ongoing investigation into suspected bid-rigging. No final finding that M&J Group infringed competition law through bid-rigging should be inferred unless and until such a finding is made by a competent authority.

Last verified: 5 October 2026 · Company no. 01371473 · Registered: 31 May 1978

Contact us on Telegram