M&J Group Files
Bid-rigging: Open
ANALYSIS

The £25,000 Penalty vs M&J's Revenue and Profit

Putting the CMA penalties in financial context.

Last verified: 5 October 2026

IMPORTANT DISTINCTION

The penalties described on this website concern failures to comply with CMA investigative requirements during an inspection.

The separate CMA investigation into suspected bid-rigging remains ongoing.

The CMA has expressly stated that no assumption should currently be made that competition law has been infringed.

The £25,000 company administrative penalty is small relative to M&J Group's annual turnover and profit. This page compares the penalty against the company's 2025 financial results to provide context.

Company Penalty
£25,000
vs £40.8m turnover = 0.06%
Combined Penalties
£50,000
vs £4.4m pre-tax profit = 1.1%

The Comparison

  • £25,000 company penalty vs £40.8 million turnover (2025) — approximately 0.06%.
  • £25,000 company penalty vs ~£4.4 million pre-tax profit (2025) — approximately 0.57%.
  • £50,000 combined penalties (company + individuals) vs ~£4.4 million pre-tax profit — approximately 1.1%.

An Important Distinction

The personal penalties imposed on Barry Pirrie (£20,000) and Tracey Woods (£5,000) are separate from the company penalty. They are not company expenses unless the accounts later establish otherwise.

All financial figures should be verified against the original filed accounts before reliance.

Source

CMA Administrative Penalty Notice — M&J Group, 17 September 2026 [S003]

Source

Companies House — Group accounts to 31 December 2025 [S007]

M&J Group Files

Independent Investigative Publication

An independent investigation into M&J Group, CMA enforcement, public procurement and the roofing bid-rigging inquiry. Not affiliated with M & J Group (Construction & Roofing) Ltd.

M&J Group Files is an independent investigative publication and is not affiliated with M & J Group (Construction & Roofing) Ltd. The publication reports regulatory decisions, public procurement records, Companies House filings, official documents and attributable reporting. The CMA's administrative penalties relating to investigatory compliance are distinct from the separate ongoing investigation into suspected bid-rigging. No final finding that M&J Group infringed competition law through bid-rigging should be inferred unless and until such a finding is made by a competent authority.

Last verified: 5 October 2026 · Company no. 01371473 · Registered: 31 May 1978

Contact us on Telegram